How To Open Coffee Machine Briel

Quello che il cardinal Martini non vuole dire

At the end of this post will be asked a question.

Provoked Ignazio Marino on Vatican II and artificial insemination, the Cardinal Martini, in his weekly page in the Corriere della Sera , weighs the words, indeed, the sips, so that the pager shows some difficult to fill the spaces.
Marino "asks" is that you are returning to the literal interpretation of Scripture, with the abandonment of historical criticism, with the result that the Church is moving away by science? And why can not satisfy the desires of infertile couples using in vitro fertilization? And to eliminate the diseases of the embryo appeared to "early stages of development"? And why not use embryonic stem cells to cure serious diseases groped, especially the cells that can be taken from frozen embryos that will never be used for breeding purposes?
As can be seen, of "irons in the fire" for a cardinal of the Roman Catholic Church there is, and many more.

And indeed, at first, Martini proves to be - when he wants - which is quite severe. The fears over the life of the Church does not derive as much from the question of the method of reading the Holy Scriptures:

"There would be other concerns today, but this would be a long speech.
Suffice to mention the tendency to formalism liturgical
with a sort of vanity, which is expressed in love for the liturgical vestments and ceremonies, but not
has the same enthusiasm for the offering of himself to God. "

In each story takes bad : Cardinal Martini and unearthed them, those who really want to pray during the Mass and bear it longer than 45 minutes of "canonical", and perhaps avoid the churches with the guitars and prefer those where there is a bit 'of silence (or there is a Gregorian) or are moved in front of the vestments of the priest as it moves towards the altar ...

Hypocrites! Shout Cardinal: I know that you do not present yourselves to God!
really a great ability to read minds and hearts ...

Well, I told myself: if you have stored in this manner the faithful, who knows what comes out on in vitro fertilization ...

"The problem is very complex ..."

and, shortly thereafter,

"The experience and listening to the laity will teach us many things,"

Ouch ...

Condemnation of in vitro fertilization? There. Indeed, compared to under hypothetical fact Marino by a mass action in in vitro fertilization, Martini replied

"The assumptions that you make an orientation towards the mass
playing in a test tube does not convince me. do not think we can come in tomorrow
to remove all of the sexual act by the generation .

A bit 'yeah ... but not quite. Moreover

- Cardinal points out there - we're talking about "criticism of a certain world Catholic for assisted reproduction" : looks a bit ', again the bad (persistent, dull, exaggerated, intolerant ...) are in the Catholic world. Throughout

Marino response to the word Church is not : there are the small group of Catholics "fools" (those who think the liturgical formalism, those who criticize the IVF), and there are those who are ready to "careful reflection on sense of human sexuality in the line of Vatican II "(will be" in the future ": John Paul II must have spoken and written for someone else ...); this last group may be permitted, even the current pope, provided a continuous surprised "with the outputs challenging" ...

Back in vitro fertilization (this is a prolife blog).

produced embryos with fertilization and deaths in vitro? Silence.

In vitro fertilization as a denial of human and Christian meaning of sexuality? Silence.

possible to freeze embryos? Silence.

possible to dissolve the frozen embryos to extract stem cells? Well, at least this card. Martini, tell us that it is wrong, that the embryo has a right not only to not be artificially produced, but also not to be dismembered and killed, tell us how horrible it is the idea of \u200b\u200bcausing the deaths of men to experiment, make some reference the Nazi madness, invented something ...

"About the possible use of stem cells derived from embryos
, we must solve the problem
taking into account the dignity of every human person. To date, it is thought that cells from embryos can not
be used with good results.
In all these things will require use of reason, without getting caught by
personal emotions. "

you happen to have the answer? We must think ...

James Rocchi

PS I forgot the question! If you

un Cardinale di Santa Romana Chiesa, cosa dovete scrivere per avere a disposizione una pagina a settimana sul Corriere della Sera?

Bes Cd Interest Rates

Fecondazione artificiale: nuoce gravemente alla salute!

Sul sito dell'Associazione Luca Coscioni è apparsa una lettera:

"Mi chiamo Isabella e ho 39 anni. Ho fatto tre ICSI eterologhe
all'estero. Due fallite e una terza con aborto spontaneo al secondo mese. Totale euro spesi in 18 mesi: circa 30.000 (mutuo). Totale sofferenza spesa per aver voluto esporre ogni percorso alla luce del sole a medici privati e pubblici, a parenti, conoscenti e amici per raccogliere forza e per lottare ancora: indefinibile! Oggi, after one year, are in operation for mutual uterus: too many drugs, they say! After twelve years of marriage are separate:
difficult paths, they say! Simpler and more human I would have made it more natural
, even where the natural, nature, lacking "

is where the false hopes brought about by in vitro fertilization lead women.

James Rocchi

Who Does The Best Brazilian Wax Victoria Bc

Antilingua e selezione degli embrioni

Pier Giorgio Liverani, on "Future" of 21/11/scorso , in his column "setoff", with his usual wit attacks Ignazio Marino for an article on artificial insemination and the Law 40, which has set:

"Law 40 - is the title of the article by Marino -
damages your health '. He thinks that of women, the rest of us think that
Embryos manipulated, abused, discarded, frozen food items as
experiment. He cites as a witness to "the Bioethics Committee of
Waldensian Church (do not understand how a community of Christians can
accept these treatments) and the ' secular state ', whose laws, writes
Unity (Friday 19) "are the summary of all shared values \u200b\u200bin
society" (a kind pot-pourri moral), but it is rather a secular state
where there is sharing, but special care to [dis] values,
first of which the availability of human life.
PS I wrote 'embryos', but it is a word of
antilingua , you accept that because 'neutral':
if you used the right one - child- surely these speeches to
Marino would be difficult to propose and accept. "

Ignazio Marino , in his article on" Compare ", placed, inter alia, a question:" Yet if we consider normal and responsible to run the checks before of a pregnancy, in order to detect any diseases, then why in a secular state should not be normal, having the same objective, pre-implantation diagnosis? Why the law should oblige a woman to implant an embryo with even a very serious genetic disease and then make it possible to terminate the pregnancy by abortion? " Liverani does not answer this question.

Let us dwell on some point.

Women's health : Liverani opposed to the embryos, but flying over the dangers to health - physical and psychological - of women resulting from artificial insemination techniques. A law - such as Law 40 - authorizing the artificial insemination is endangering women's health.

Life embryos: Liverani thinks only to that of embryos manipulated, abused, discarded, frozen? Liverani does not think embryos destined to certain death for the mere fact that artificial insemination is permitted?

How many dead embryos and without being "manipulated, abused, discarded, or frozen?

For them, you should not use the word "Son"?

The availability of human life: allow in vitro fertilization does not really mean that?

The Christian Community: perhaps accept that the Catholic Church in vitro fertilization?

The abortion law (referred to Marino to justify PGD): 40 because the law was "without prejudice" law 194?

is to be observed: if Liverani really think of embryos as children , this talk of balance on a thin wire would be difficult to propose e da accettare ...

Giacomo Rocchi

Do Broken Capillaries Heal?

Volontari buoni e volontari cattivi

Abbiamo già commentato l'intervista a Repubblica Torino di Walter Boero , pronto a tranciare giudizi sui volontari per la vita e a qualificare come "poche decine di esagitati" coloro che non la pensano come lui.

Sara Strippoli , la giornalista di Repubblica Torino che da diverse settimane sta conducendo il giornale nella battaglia contro il "Patto per la Vita", ha evidentemente trovato un diverso modo per combatterlo: dall'interno del mondo prolife .
E così - sul "modello Boero" - la volontaria che opera al "Maurice" is at pains to understand how to behave the volunteer proliferation. Let's see:

" Carla says that freedom of choice is a priority, but which to choose in freedom should know, understand the problem from all points of view." Compared to young couples who are "listening and I wonder how I would react in their place."

Especially "nobody wants to convince anyone here," says Carla. "

This is the greatest sin, punished by expulsion from the group. Carla tells it: "He knows that even among the volunteers there are exalted, and admits: I've seen some years ago at the Maria Vittoria. "What were they excited?" They walked among the beds of those who had an abortion the next day to try to convince them not to do so . "Look at ', one of the" exalted "there was also a girl who had been helped: "We helped a girl who obviously thought of having to return the favor (maybe thought of having to return the favor to other women ). He took our brochures and distribute them to go on the wards. "

Horror! The brochure must remain within the" booth " (as he defines Republic)!

Carla

When she noticed that the girl" exalted "distributed the brochure between the beds of the candidates on abortion, had only one fear: "They thought we were we" . Distinction must therefore be: "When we realized who was responsible we have removed" .

One may wonder that, faced with this behavior balanced ("Not everyone has the right balance," said the volunteer) to be helped only women who had already decided not to abort? "Those who come to us because it is thought likely to keep the child."

Here, Carla and Sara Strippoli we have exposed the "etiquette of the perfect volunteer prolific : her place, do not give too much bother, rispondere solo se interrogati, non far conoscere il materiale informativo se non richiesto (chissà, forse anche: non sporcare il gabbiotto e chiudere la porta a chiave quando esci? ).

Sarà forse così: ma come mai - insistenti e fastidiose - vengono alla mente le parole di Benedetto XVI?

"nel difendere la vita non dobbiamo temere l’ostilità e l’impopolarità, rifiutando ogni compromesso ed ambiguità, che ci conformerebbero alla mentalità di questo mondo."

Giacomo Rocchi

Congratulations Engagement Card Wording

Fecondazione artificiale: la nebbia

Insomma: per i cattolici esiste una fecondazione artificiale buona e una fecondazione artificiale cattiva, oppure le tecniche di fecondazione artificiale devono essere respinte in blocco?

Ci siamo fatti questa domanda in un precedente post di commento alla durissima presa di posizione dei vescovi polacchi , alla vigilia della discussione in Parlamento dei progetti di legge su questo argomento; abbiamo osservato che quella presa di posizione era perfettamente conforme al Magistero della Chiesa Cattolica; abbiamo, infine, mostrato stupore per le modalità con cui il quotidiano dei Vescovi Italiani presentava la notizia ("La Polonia cerca la sua legge 40").

Nel post seguente abbiamo visto come il Italian Catholic world expresses the very different positions: on the same day future of live interviews with those working in IVF for many years and who can build and bring readers with "his" moral, articles that are attributed to the detrimental effects of denial of human dignity only to certain practices (such as the freezing of embryos or preimplantation diagnosis) and not the techniques themselves and in the writings of those who, with great clarity, the negative signals of all the techniques themselves.

We took the cue from an article by Lawrence Shoepflin "E 'Life," selective reporting in the press of the Polish bishops, in a short article on "Fertility Show in London (Future of 04/11/2010), journalist, after having expressed" the impression is that we are facing a real market for artificial insemination "and then you have found the fair" is perfectly in line with the thought that reduces human life to a product of the laboratory, "stigmatizing consequences" surrogacy, gamete donation, children for homosexual couples, then making reference to the freezing of embryos and seed banks: "Even the European Bank of seed and this will probably advertise its catalog of donors are classified based on their race and color of eyes."

But you can really criticize these practices without realizing - and to state publicly - that they are logical consequences of the techniques of in vitro fertilization?

Man / embryo becomes a product and its dignity is denied because it is produced in this way: therefore becomes irrelevant to the death of nine out of ten embryos, but do not cause problems, the freezing of embryos or their diagnosis techniques invasive, their selection, and again, seed banks or heterologous fertilization under the logic of a more refined production that adapts to any situation.

Why the Italian Catholic world is unable to express an opinion clearly and decided on in vitro fertilization?

Two possible answers.

First, we have already mentioned: there is a clear push by those who practice in vitro fertilization to legitimize this practice: a move which is linked to business and scientific ambitions.

We talked about Dr Eleonora Porcu, since the referendum, found a bank in the Catholic world to publicize his technique of freezing oocytes (eggs freeze better than freezing the embryos), but other diagnostic techniques have emphasized on women's eggs ("better diagnosis on the polar bodies of oocytes rather than the female embryo diagnosis ").

How to business, such as forgetting the clinics of Catholic inspiration - first of all: the San Raffaele Hospital in Milan - that authorized under Law 40, working in the field (IVF and ICSI) receiving millions of euro of refunds from the National Health Service (Source: Corriere della Sera)? Clinics, after the Constitutional Court, shall, if necessary, to freeze embryos?

A second answer lies in Law 40, which has become - in part unconsciously - a filter for interpreting reality.

Ecco che, di fronte agli impetuosi vescovi polacchi, la reazione dell'ignoto titolista è quasi automatica: "la situazione della Polonia è identica a quella dell'Italia prima della legge 40 (il "far west della provetta"), noi cattolici abbiamo proposto e difeso la legge 40 , quindi la legge 40 è buona , quindi la Polonia ha bisogno di una legge 40 ".

Ma se la legge 40 è "buona", la morte prevista ed attuata di decine di migliaia di embrioni all'anno diventa ininfluente, su di essa si può sorvolare: i "cattivi" sono altri, quelli che fanno diagnosi genetica preimpianto, le banche del seme, le maternità surrogate. "Cattivi" sono solo quelli che, nel mondo, fanno ciò che in Italia la legge 40 vieta ( e infatti è difficile dire che sono davvero "cattivi" quelli che congelano gli embrioni perché, si sa, la legge 40 permette il congelamento - ovviamente in casi eccezionali! ).

Siamo alla nebbia; a discorsi cauti per paura di sbagliare ...

La legge 40, come tutte le leggi ingiuste, ha già iniziato ad incidere sulle coscienze.

Giacomo Rocchi