Ho cercato di ignorare in questi giorni tutto il caos creato da Santoro e da Annozero, ma curiosando per il web non ho potuto fare a meno di notare che ci sono persone che ritengono che il programma sia una salvezza dalla grande censura.
Non posso fare a meno di pormi ancora una volta la domanda, ma censura da che, di chi?
Ci sono determinate correnti ideologiche che ancora battono il tasto della censura, della dittatura imminente, della soppressione di ideologie che dovrebbero essere considerate la libertà e la democrazia.
Peccato che in Italia la Democracy is not there, shame that the history books our children are studying biased and distorted by a history written by the winners of course are the "good" while others are "bad."
Santoro A journalist can not be regarded as a sure salvation, is not the champion of freedom, he is nothing but a journalist who speculates on the scoop, it makes headlines, quarrels with the press of his own ideological trend, or rather why not accused of inefficiency all the volunteers of Civil Defence, people who leave their families to help others, it is all over the papers here and that's it.
The most interesting thing is that the day after on Facebook and on many blogs you are faced with a revolution against the famous bridge of Messina, waste of public money etc.. etc.. In short, the same old soup warmed to perfection to ensure that the bank balance go up, because Santoro does not declare its actual earnings for each of its outputs from the first woman?
Because for once is not enough information to make real, non-partisan mud and especially those who do not volunteer to sacrifice themselves for others and sometimes take risks incalculable in person?
ù
Personally, I express the utmost respect for all those who helped the people of Abruzzo and they have done is that Italy has shown the world how a great country in the face of great tragedy is able to field large forces and a lot of solidarity.
